Evaluation of the criteria for renewal of LHRH agonists in patients with prostate cancer: results of the ANAREN Study

Jesús Calleja-Escudero, Víctor Barrondo, Andrés Rodriguez-Alonso, Francisco Gómez-Veiga, Joan Bestard, Antonio Gómez-Caamaño, Anne-Sophie Grandoulier, Maria Pérez-Sampietro, Venancio Chantada-Abal, Raúl Poza de Celis, on behalf of ANAREN Study Group

Abstract

Introduction: Injectable extended-release formulations of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists (LHRHa) have simplified the treatment of prostate cancer with a satisfactory level of androgen castration. This study aims to determine the percentage of patients whose initial LHRHa prescription was renewed during follow-up, how many changed formulation and how their quality of life evolved.

Methods: This is an observational, prospective, multicentre study of men with prostate cancer who were to receive treatment with LHRHa (triptorelin every 3 or 6 months, leuprorelin every 3 or 6 months, or goserelin every 3 months) for 24 months. The treatment used was recorded and quality of life was assessed (QLQ-PR25 questionnaire) at four follow-up visits.

Results: A total of 497 men (median age 75 years) were evaluated. The median exposure to LHRHa was 24 months. The initial prescription was renewed in 95.7% at follow-up 1 and 75% at follow-up 4. The main reason for changing from a 6-month to a 3-month formulation was a preference for sequential treatment (according to the investigator) and to see the physician more frequently (according to the patient). The main reason for switching from the 3-month to 6-month formulation was simplification of treatment (according to the investigator) and for convenience (according to the patient). Findings in the QLQ-PR25 questionnaire revealed no changes in urinary or bowel symptoms, though an improvement in sexual activity was reported. Practically all investigators and patients were satisfied/very satisfied with the treatment.

Conclusion: Changes in formulation were scarce and generally justified by convenience factors or personal preferences. Patients maintained a good health status, with a high rate of retention of LHRHa treatment.

Clinical Trial Registration: Study number: A-ES-52014-224.

A plain language summary is provided as supplementary material (available at: https://dic-wp.zaphod.dev/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/dic.2024-2-2-Suppl.pdf).

Article Details

Article Type

Original Research

DOI

10.7573/dic.2024-2-2

Publication Dates

Accepted: ; Published: .

Citation

Calleja-Escudero J, Barrondo V, Rodriguez-Alonso A, Gómez-Veiga F, Bestard J, Gómez-Caamaño A, Grandoulier AS, Pérez-Sampietro M, Chantada-Abal V, Poza de Celis R, on behalf of ANAREN Study Group. Evaluation of the criteria for renewal of LHRH agonists in patients with prostate cancer: results of the ANAREN Study. Drugs Context. 2024;13:2024-2-2. https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.2024-2-2

Article Views

Monthly article views (last 11 months)

Drugs in Context PubMed Central
Source HTML views PDF downloads Totals
Drugs in Context since September 15, 2025 12 0 12
PubMed Central since November 1, 2024 105 56 161
Totals 117 56 173
Register for alerts

I would like to be contacted by Drugs in Context when new articles are posted.

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.